 |



 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
And this time - I know for certain I'm not alone... I am a huge, giant, costume wearing, screaming at the screen, and dancing in the aisle fan of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. I love everything about it. I think it's perfect just the way it is. It's fun, it's campy, it's got par-tici-pation. Why? Why am I telling you this? Because MTV plans to cash in on the string of remakes going around the imaginationless studios that keep rehashing old - but good - ideas instead of coming to the screen with something new. MTV plans to remake the Rocky Horror Picture Show. I can see it now... they'll get one of the jonas brothers to play the doctor - everybody now - that is NOT right. (granted, I'll give you that I could honest to goodness see someone like Dave Navarro but MTV won't do that - they'll give you bubblegum where you want hard candy...) If you've never seen it, and like campy stuff, find someone who knows the responses - find a theater with a midnight showing - and watch it. See Tim Curry be just about the strangest character ever to grace a screen. And completely OWN it. If you have seen it and hated it - you went with the wrong people. If you've seen it and LOVED it - sign the petition. Maybe it won't do any good but, one never knows. Can't anyone just leave well enough alone and quit messing with the classics? Save The Lips Tags: blogging my weird, rocky horror picture show Current Mood: annoyed
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I am learning - as I do this whole critique thing - that I make a very poor reader of fantasy. Logic sets in too hard, too deep in a rut and I'm thrown completely out of a story I might otherwise enjoy. It's starting to get on my own nerves - let alone the poor writers for whom I am critting. I see certain words and they drive me bats. Human. That's the biggest of them. I see human, I immediate place the story on Earth or on a planet colonized by Earth. Because I cannot see how the etymological evolution of an alien language would evolve to call a species, however similar to our own, by the same name. I realize it's anal and probably petty but I also can't seem to get past it. But, the word people doesn't bother me. Perhaps because, translated, most tribes call themselves - The People. Perhaps it's the translation idea - that fiction we read here is really nothing more than a translation, that if we were to be on said planet, it certainly wouldn't be english we were hearing (or whatever language it's translated into from there) and I could see People being translated that way but for some reason, not human. Human is different and I'm not sure why. Another is the use of the word earth for alien dirt when being spoken by a native of said alien planet who has never heard of earth. Why would that word be there. Soil, loam, dirt, mud, sand - those all work for me but calling dirt - earth - just doesn't. I can't find the logic of the word choice. Part of me is pretty sure this is JUST me. That I'm just THAT weird to have stupid stuff like that stick in my craw. But a smaller part of me wonders if I'm so far off base. But it does explain why I don't read much non-earth-centered fantasy. Goblins, witches, ghouls, demons, orcs, dragons, fairies - I can suspend my disbelief for all of those. So why not humans? why do these things bother me?
Tags: blogging my weird, crits, writing Current Mood: confused
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I don't know why but I kind of enjoy revealing my quirks. So, I've decided to post these on a semi-regular basis... how long that will last, I'm not sure yet. Part of my writing process is the submission process. I'm very anal now about how I keep track of submissions, markets, response times. I have three spreadsheets I use almost daily. One for the current year, one for last year, and my overall tracking thing. Before I instituted these sheets, I sent the exact same poetry submission to the same market twice in 8 months. You would think this wouldn't be difficult but, given the amount of poetry I write and that is in the market-process at any given time, the fact that all three poems were the same (and the fact that the poor editor noticed) is miraculous. Determined never to allow this to happen again - I made spreadsheets. I can count just by opening the titles spreadsheets exactly how many times a poem or short story has been rejected. I tend to pull poems from the submission process completely when they hit 15 rejections. Someday, when I'm blocked, I'll go back and look at them but they're not a priority. I haven't actually had many poems hit that mark. I think in total, there are four that have. But some are getting close. Fiction is a little different. I've only had one story rejected more than ten times (so far) and that one - it wasn't finished but I was too new at this, too determined not to have a monster onmy hands that I didn't see it. Said story no can't be called a short story. It's 20,000 words long now but,at least it's finished. I revise and rewrite a lot, maybe more than I should. I've killed stories but, not because they've been rejected too many times, but because they were really bad. (trust me, they were. even the ideas were bad :P) So, dear readers who happen to be writers - when do you pull a story or poem from the submission process? I leave out novels on purpose here as that's a very different kind of process. ~S Tags: blogging my weird, the process, writing Current Mood: curious
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I am often informed by my fellow writerly types that I'm a rather odd duck. I work my way and it's logical for me. My schedule is getting more and more hectic now with Wolverine walking and playing and generally being more kid than baby but I keep managing. Under normal circumstances, I have a backlog of stories that are near ready for the submission process. Seeing as I probably write 20-30 short stories a year and of those, maybe 12 will be worth submitting, not having any is weird. Right now, I have nothing. Comes up because a new member just signed up for my crit group and I was considering what to repost. I have one short story and a novel. That's it. I've learned posting poetry does me no good as I keep finding homes for said poems before anyone gets around to them. so It's just one short story and one of my novels. I have other things in the pipeline sort of. but nothing really. Most of those things aren't done enough for critting and I'm not really inclined to work on them. But, i'm learning something about my process. I *need* to have seven or eight things going at once, at least if I'm not pounding my head against a deadline. If I don't, I get lazy, unfocused, and miss stupid mistakes in my plotting and characterisation. I work better when I'm stretched. I work even better when I'm lacking sleep but not caffeine. I excel when I'm pressed for time. When I have just one thing I'm working on - I get lazy and stupid. And that's where I am right now. I don't like this place. It makes me very curious though - am I the only one that works better this way? when I have ten different things going and, rather than strolling along, watching the words form themselves, I have to devote myself to my progress, pour more of myself into each project to make it decent. I can't plan a project because then I won't want to write it (as recently happened with a bog-witch idea that was decent and perhaps when I ditch the plans I can revisit). I can't just sit down and focus on one thing as I'll screw it up - make it overly complicated or miss stupid inconsistencies in favor of word-trickery. The less I think about something, the better it turns out. Am I the only one like that? I often wonder.... Tags: blogging my weird, writing Current Mood: weird
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|
 |
|
 |